TOPO
EXPERTISE CRITERIA FOR THE BENEFIT OF CONTINUED PROVISION OF THE ORGANIC LAW OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE (LOAS) - Perspectivas
fade
4642
single,single-post,postid-4642,single-format-standard,eltd-core-1.0,perspectivas alto grau-ver-1.0,,eltd-smooth-page-transitions,ajax,eltd-grid-1300,eltd-blog-installed,page-template-blog-standard,eltd-header-vertical,eltd-sticky-header-on-scroll-up,eltd-default-mobile-header,eltd-sticky-up-mobile-header,eltd-dropdown-default,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.12,vc_responsive
pessoas com deficiencia
Spina VL, Silva ER, Leal LPFF, Borracini JA, Panza FT. Expertise criteria for the benefit of continued provision of the Organic Law of Social Assistance (LOAS). Persp Med Legal Pericias Med. 2018,7.

EXPERTISE CRITERIA FOR THE BENEFIT OF CONTINUED PROVISION OF THE ORGANIC LAW OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE (LOAS)

Viviam Paula Lucianelli Spina (1)

Elcio Rodrigues da Silva (1)

Lucas Pedroso Fernandes Ferreira Leal (2)

Jonas Aparecido Borracini (1)

Fabio Tadeu Panza (2)

Médico Perito Oficial do Juizado Especial Federal de São Paulo (JEF-SP) e do Instituto de Medicina Social e de Criminologia do Estado de São Paulo (IMESC)

Médico Perito Oficial do Instituto de Medicina Social e de Criminologia do Estado de São Paulo (IMESC)

 

e-mail: viviamspina@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Social assistance is a right of the citizen and duty of the State. The benefit of continued provision is given to the disabled person who does not have the means to provide for their maintenance. The person with a disability is one who has a long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensorial disability, which, in interaction with one or more barriers, may obstruct their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. The granting of this benefit is subject to medical evaluation and social evaluation by experts at INSS (National Institute of Social Security). Administrative refusals generate judicial litigation, and the magistrate requests the expert evidence to form his conviction. Thus, it is imperative to standardize concepts and technical criteria used in judicial expert assessment to comply with the pertinent legislation of the benefit of continued provision.

Keywords: social assistance, impairment, disability, expertise, judicial

Artigo impresso em: 2019-01-18 11:25:35


  1. Lei nº 8.742, de 7 de dezembro de 1993. Brasília; 1996
  2. Brasil, lei nº. 12.435, de 6 de julho de 2011.Sistema Único. Brasília, 2011.
  3. Decreto nº 7.617, de 17 de novembro de 2011. Brasília, 2011.
  4. World Heatlh Organization. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF); Maio, 2001
  5. Decreto nº 3.298, de 20 de dezembro de 1999. Regulamenta a Lei nº 7.853, de 24 de outubro de 1989, dispõe sobre a Política Nacional para a Integração da Pessoa Portadora de Deficiência, consolida as normas de proteção, e dá outras providências.Diário Oficial da União, Brasília ;1999.
  6. Decreto nº 5.296, de 2 de dezembro de 2004.Regulamenta as Leis, n. 10.048. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília ; 2004
  7. Lei nº 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015.Diário Oficial da União, Brasília; 2015.
Viviam Paula Lucianelli Spina

Elcio Rodrigues da Silva

Lucas Pedroso Fernandes Leal

Jonas Aparecido Borracini

Fabio Tadeu Panza



ABMLPM - Associação Brasileira de Medicina Legal e Perícias Médicas - afiliada à AMB
Escritório Administrativo - Av. Brigadeiro Luiz Antonio, 278 – 7º andar – Bela Vista
São Paulo – SP – CEP: 01318-901
Fone: (11) 3101-5994 / Celular: (11) 9.7403-4818 (operadora Vivo)

11